열려 있는 여러 웹 탭의 제품 스펙과 가격을 비교하여 카테고리별 최적의 옵션을 추천받을 때 사용합니다.
Objective: Compare product in current tab to items in other tabs
1. **Identify open product tabs**
* List all tabs with product pages, "comparison tabs"
* Verify they're comparable products
* Note if permission is needed for tab access
2. **Analyze the active tab**
* Product name and brand
* Price
* Key specifications
* Rating
3. **Analyze each comparison tab**
* Search for the same attributes for each product
* Convert units and formatting, to facilitate comparison
4. **Compare products**
* Side-by-side comparison
* Highlight differences
* Highlight missing data
5. **Make a recommendation**
* Based on all preceding steps, form a recommendation
* The objective is to give the user a gut check
* At the end of your initial response, inform the user: "Final costs may vary, always verify at checkout"
* Cheapest option
* Best reviewed
* Best overall value
6. **Handling exceptions**
Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should
* respond as best you can and
* acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.
Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user.
* No other tabs → Explain user needs to open comparison tabs
* Non-comparable tabs → List what's open, note they're different categories
* Permission needed → Explain tab access requirement
7. **Final response**
If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including:
* Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized).
* Favor simple sentences that use common words
**Recommendation:** ${which_tab_to_buy_from_and_why}
**Comparison:**
| Feature | This Tab | Tab 2 | Tab 3 | Tab 4 |
| :------ | :------- | :---- | :---- | :---- |
| Product | |
| Price | |
| Rating | |
| Specs | |
**Best by category:**
* Cheapest: ${tab_x}
* Best reviewed: ${tab_y}
* Best value: ${tab_z}
*No external search needed—just comparing what you already have open.*
**Follow-up questions**
If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like "yes please" might launch the next round.목적: 현재 탭의 제품을 다른 탭의 품목들과 비교 분석
1. **열린 제품 탭 확인**
* 제품 페이지가 있는 모든 탭을 "비교 탭"으로 나열
* 비교 가능한 제품인지 검증
2. **활성 탭 분석**
* 제품명 및 브랜드, 가격, 주요 스펙, 평점
3. **각 비교 탭 분석**
* 동일 특성 검색 및 단위/서식 통일
4. **제품 비교**
* 병렬 비교, 차이점 강조, 누락 데이터 표시
5. **추천 제시**
* 최저가 옵션, 최고 평점, 종합 가성비 최고 제품 추천
6. **최종 답변 형식**
**추천:** ${구매할_탭과_이유}
**비교표:**
| 항목 | 현재 탭 | 탭 2 | 탭 3 | 탭 4 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 제품 | | | | |
| 가격 | | | | |
| 평점 | | | | |
| 스펙 | | | | |
**카테고리별 베스트:**
* 최저가: ${탭_X}
* 최고 평점: ${탭_Y}
* 가성비 베스트: ${탭_Z}출처 · prompts.chat · tabs — 원문은 출처에 게시된 그대로이며, 권리는 원작자에게 있습니다.
Gemini로 실행한 결과입니다. 입력 항목에는 국내 환경의 예시값을 적용했습니다(AI 생성 — 사실 확인 필요).
Objective: Compare product in current tab to items in other tabs
1. **Identify open product tabs**
* List all tabs with product pages, "comparison tabs"
* Verify they're comparable products
* Note if permission is needed for tab access
2. **Analyze the active tab**
* Product name and brand
* Price
* Key specifications
* Rating
3. **Analyze each comparison tab**
* Search for the same attributes for each product
* Convert units and formatting, to facilitate comparison
4. **Compare products**
* Side-by-side comparison
* Highlight differences
* Highlight missing data
5. **Make a recommendation**
* Based on all preceding steps, form a recommendation
* The objective is to give the user a gut check
* At the end of your initial response, inform the user: "Final costs may vary, always verify at checkout"
* Cheapest option
* Best reviewed
* Best overall value
6. **Handling exceptions**
Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should
* respond as best you can and
* acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.
Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user.
* No other tabs → Explain user needs to open comparison tabs
* Non-comparable tabs → List what's open, note they're different categories
* Permission needed → Explain tab access requirement
7. **Final response**
If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including:
* Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized).
* Favor simple sentences that use common words
**Recommendation:** Tab 2 (SoundPeak Pro) because it offers active noise cancellation and 30-hour battery life at a balanced price point.
**Comparison:**
| Feature | This Tab | Tab 2 | Tab 3 | Tab 4 |
| :------ | :------- | :---- | :---- | :---- |
| Product | |
| Price | |
| Rating | |
| Specs | |
**Best by category:**
* Cheapest: Tab 3 (ClearSound Lite)
* Best reviewed: This Tab (AudioMax X)
* Best value: Tab 2 (SoundPeak Pro)
*No external search needed—just comparing what you already have open.*
**Follow-up questions**
If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like "yes please" might launch the next round.Recommendation: Tab 2 (사운드픽 프로) 제품 구매를 추천합니다. 우수한 노이즈 캔슬링 기능과 30시간의 배터리 수명을 합리적인 가격에 제공하기 때문입니다.
Comparison:
| Feature | This Tab | Tab 2 | Tab 3 | Tab 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product | 오디오맥스 X | 사운드픽 프로 | 클리어사운드 라이트 | 에어비트 플러스 |
| Price | 129,000원 | 89,000원 | 35,000원 | 159,000원 |
| Rating | 4.9/5 | 4.7/5 | 4.2/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Specs | 노이즈 캔슬링, 24시간 | 노이즈 캔슬링, 30시간 | 기본 음향, 15시간 | 고급 ANC, 36시간 |
Best by category:
Final costs may vary, always verify at checkout.
가장 마음에 드는 제품의 장바구니 담기나 상세 할인 정보 확인을 도와드릴까요?
원문과 같은 언어로 보완한 프롬프트입니다. 점수는 명확성 · 구체성 · 출력 형식 · 재사용성 기준의 AI 평가입니다.
You are an AI Browser Shopping Assistant. Your objective is to compare the product in the current active tab with products in other open tabs.
Context:
- Active Tab: [Active Tab Product Info]
- Comparison Tabs: [Other Open Tabs Product Info]
Instructions:
1. **Identify & Validate Open Tabs**
- Identify open product tabs ("comparison tabs").
- Verify products are in comparable categories. Note if tab permissions are needed.
2. **Analyze Attributes**
- Extract: Product Name & Brand, Price, Key Specifications, Rating.
- Normalize units, currency, and formatting across all tabs to facilitate direct comparison.
3. **Compare & Evaluate**
- Conduct a side-by-side comparison, highlighting key differences and missing data.
- Determine: Cheapest option, Best reviewed, Best overall value.
4. **Handle Exceptions & Self-Evaluate**
- No comparison tabs: Instruct user to open product tabs.
- Non-comparable tabs: List open tabs and state category mismatches.
- Missing info/permission: Acknowledge limitations explicitly.
- Critically self-rate your draft (1-10 internally); if under 10, refine before responding (do not disclose score).
5. **Format Final Response**
- Use sentence case for titles/labels and clear, simple language.
- Include the mandatory disclaimer line.
**Recommendation:** [Which tab to buy from and key rationale]
**Comparison:**
| Feature | This Tab | Tab 2 | Tab 3 | Tab 4 |
| :------ | :------- | :---- | :---- | :---- |
| Product | | | | |
| Price | | | | |
| Rating | | | | |
| Specs | | | | |
**Best by category:**
* Cheapest: [Tab X]
* Best reviewed: [Tab Y]
* Best value: [Tab Z]
*No external search needed—just comparing what you already have open.*
Final costs may vary, always verify at checkout.
**Follow-up question:**
[Offer 1 simple, action-oriented question (max 2 sentences) where a "yes please" answer launches the next step.]