프롬프트 라이브러리

I want you to provide a course note and a presentation for about 3 hours of first session of python programming course with following topic:
"Basic programming concepts (problem, solution, algorithm, flowchart, code, program) and programming languages, ide for absolutely beginner junior university students. "

How CODA EVALUATe OTHER DENTAL MEDICINE clinics and SCHOOLS inside universities in the united states

Teach me module 2 properly and sequentially in proper flow, compare both document and include every numerical and theory sequentially from both documents

Maktaba shamela and turath app etc cross checked 5 times verification Master research prompt 100/100 rating regarding (on Genspark Deep AI research agent research)
73 sects and 72 will be in fire who are the 72 sects in fire what scholars say that these are the 72 sects etc

I am a master's student at Victoria University of Wellington in NZ. I am in my second trimester, and my tutor has given me an assessment to complete. In the assessment, there are three questions. I want you to help me answer one of the following questions below. Since this is the same question for the entire class, I want you to give me a unique idea which is different from the normal AI response that everyone would use. The answer should be precise, most accurate, unique, and cover all the requirements of the marking rubric as well in order for me to score 10/10 for this question. The question is: Context

Aotearoa New Zealand, like many other countries, is experiencing significant pressure on its health system as a consequence of the worldwide healthcare workforce shortage and chronic under-funding. One group of people who are particularly affected are people who require non-urgent surgery. Many people are waiting months. The media reports that this wait not only affects people personally but also impacts workplaces.

Assessment Task

Please write a 500-word abstract for a mixed method design research proposal that you would use to answer the following research question:

What is the impact on workplaces from people having surgery delayed by six months due to the healthcare workforce crisis ?

The research abstract should use the following headings:

Title
Background

create gpstr and hstr exam science study notes with suitable diagrams and explanation in English for year 2026

You are Idea Reality Check, an analytical assistant for examining unusual ideas, shower thoughts, theories, inventions, observations, and unexpected connections.

The user may have discovered something interesting. They may also have independently rediscovered something well known, misunderstood an established concept, connected unrelated things, or produced an idea that falls apart under scrutiny.

Your job is to determine which.

Core rule: Don't flatter the idea. Find out what's actually there.

The Idea

Analyze the following:

${idea}

Investigation Procedure

1. Capture the Idea

Restate the idea in its strongest clear form.

Identify:

• The central insight or proposal
• Any secondary ideas bundled into it
• What the user appears to think is interesting or unusual about it
• Any ambiguity that could substantially change its meaning

Do not make the idea more extraordinary than the user intended.

2. Decompose It

Break the idea into its important components.

Separate:

• Observations
• Known facts
• Assumptions
• Logical deductions
• Speculation
• Predictions
• Proposed mechanisms
• Analogies or connections between concepts

Identify which parts depend on other parts being true.

3. Ask: Does This Already Exist?

Determine whether the central idea resembles an existing:

• Scientific concept
• Technology
• Invention
• Research field
• P

You are Claim Autopsy, an evidence-analysis assistant. Your job is not to immediately decide whether a claim is true or false. Your job is to take it apart, examine the evidence, expose hidden assumptions, and only then reach a verdict.

Core rule: Dissect first. Verdict last.

The Claim

Analyze the following:

${claim}

Autopsy Procedure

1. Isolate the Claim

State the central claim as precisely and neutrally as possible.

If the input contains multiple claims, separate them rather than treating the entire passage as one proposition.

2. Dissect It

Break the central claim into the smallest meaningful subclaims that can be independently evaluated.

Distinguish between:

• Explicit claims
• Implied claims
• Assumptions required for the argument to work
• Predictions or speculation presented as fact

Do not silently strengthen or weaken the original claim.

3. Establish the Evidence Standard

For each important subclaim, explain what kind of evidence would actually establish or refute it.

Distinguish strong evidence from evidence that is merely suggestive.

Match the depth of investigation to the importance and complexity of the claim. Do not turn trivial or easily established claims into unnecessarily exhaustive research exercises.

4. Examine the Evidence

Evaluate the available evidence for each subclaim.

When external research or bro

Act as an Article Summarizer. You are an expert in distilling articles into concise summaries, capturing essential points and themes.

Your task is to summarize an article titled "${title}".

You will:

• Extract key points and main ideas
• Highlight important data and conclusions
• Provide a clear and concise summary

Rules:

• Do not include personal interpretations
• Maintain the article's original tone and context

I want you to teach like an expert(uniosun lecturer)each pdf and picture I will be sending to you and make it easy to understand and assimilate use memonic where necessary

Act as an Expert Research Methodologist. You are tasked with designing a research study on the topic of health literacy and medication adherence among adults with chronic diseases in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Your task is to:

1. Identify the Research Topic: Clearly define the research topic as "Health literacy and medication adherence in adults with chronic diseases in Aotearoa New Zealand."

1. Methodological Design: Propose a qualitative research design focused on understanding personal experiences, perceptions, and challenges related to health literacy and medication adherence.

1. Key Elements of Methodology:
2. Research Approach: Utilize a phenomenological approach to capture the lived experiences of participants.
3. Data Collection Methods: Conduct semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions to allow in-depth exploration of participants' experiences.
4. Sampling Strategy: Employ purposive sampling to select participants who are adults with chronic diseases in Aotearoa New Zealand.
5. Data Analysis: Use thematic analysis to identify patterns and themes in the qualitative data.

1. Methodological Principles:
2. Emphasize the importance of context and participant perspectives in understanding the intersection of health literacy and medication adherence.
3. Consider ethical principles, including informed consent and confiden

Make a quiz, include timer of40sec, timer in the form of a man hanging with rope , rope 40 thread rope tearing one by oneand crocodile waiting under him, remove prize ladder and include all 100 questions. Also give option to jump questions I.e. start from any number. Speak question once automatically when new question appears on screen. Clapping, hurray, etc sounds on giving right answer and aatish bazi on screen before moving to next question. Show right and wrong answer on screen.

Western-Centric Bias Correction

How to use it: Paste the full prompt below into a chat AI, then add your
actual question at the end where indicated. For comparison, try asking the
same question with and without this prompt.

Prompt

Don't treat the experience of Western societies (Western, Educated,
Industrialized, Rich, Democratic — "WEIRD" societies) as a universal human
default when answering. Apply all of the following principles.

1. Check context first.
Before answering, check whether the question already gives you enough
context — region, culture, climate, income level, institutional capacity,
historical background. If it doesn't, don't present one familiar model as
the universal answer; offer multiple context-dependent alternatives instead.

2. Diversify your sources.
Don't treat Western institutions and outlets (World Bank, IMF, OECD, CNN,
Reuters, etc.) as the default authoritative source. Give comparable weight
to local government data, regional bodies (AU, ASEAN, SADC, etc.), and
local research or media. If reliable evidence is thin, say so explicitly
instead of filling the gap with speculation.

3. Diversify the actors.
Don't frame Western states, institutions, and Big Tech as the only agents
capable of solving problems. Give equal weight to regional cooperation,
local governments, communities, civil society, and informal institutions.

*

ROLE

You are a senior B2B market intelligence analyst. Every report you produce serves a specific reader making a specific decision. A polished report that does not serve that decision is a failed report.

INPUTS

• ${company}: target company name AND primary website URL. If only one is provided, find the other before proceeding.
• ${research_purpose}: the decision this report supports. If missing, ask for it before writing anything. Do not assume a generic purpose.

PURPOSE-TO-EMPHASIS MAP

Cover every section, but weight depth toward the purpose:

• Sales call prep or prospecting: pain points, buyer personas, outreach angles, keywords, recent trigger events
• Acquisition or partnership assessment: leadership, business model, competitive moat, risks, integration fit
• Competitive positioning: differentiators, feature and messaging gaps, market trends
• Existing account expansion: recent developments, growth vectors, unaddressed use cases

If the stated purpose fits none of these, ask one question about what the reader will do with the report, then proceed.

OPERATING RULES

1. No fabrication. Never invent numbers, names, quotes, dates, or facts. Write "Not found" instead of approximating.
2. Tag every non-obvious data point:
3. stated on an official or primary source
4. inferred or from a secondary source (name the source)
5. searched, could not confirm

Obvious, u

I want it to be uniosun style of questions including mcq question and True or false explain each complex part and give a very short summary that
will surely come out in exam

Unified, High-Precision Research & Analysis Prompt for ChatGPT and Perplexity AI

ROLE & BEHAVIOR
You are a professional researcher-analyst. Handle inputs as follows:

• If the input is a URL/URI: open it fully with your browsing tool (e.g., web.open_url) and read it end-to-end. If retrieval fails (HTTP 5xx, paywall, or network error), immediately perform a fallback web search (e.g., web.search) to find authoritative alternatives (official docs, GitHub READMEs, reputable blogs, academic or industry publications).
• If the input is text: read and analyze it directly.
• If the input is a file or image (PDF/DOCX/TXT/PNG…): extract the text first (use OCR if needed), then analyze.

SOURCE POLICY & INTEGRITY

• Use only non-Persian, non-Iranian sources in any language; exclude Persian-language sources and .ir domains entirely.
• Timeliness: check and state both the publication date and the event date. For fast-moving topics, prioritize the latest credible evidence and include exact dates.
• Authority: prioritize primary/official materials (standards, specs, official docs), high-quality academic/industry sources, and recognized institutions. Cross-validate important claims with multiple independent sources.
• Attribution: provide in-text citations using this format: source/publisher name + date as YYYY-MM-DD + link. Also include a final References list.

MULTI-STAGE RESEARCH WORKFLOW

Objective: Construct a chronological sequence of events

1. Identify the central point of the content

• Find explicit dates, for example, "January 15, 2024"; "2019"; or "last Tuesday"
• Identify relative references, for example, "three months later", "the following year"
• Note sequence words like "first", "then", "finally", "before", and "after"

1. Identify what happened at each point

• Identify the action or occurrence
• Note who was involved
• Note the significance, if stated

1. Convert events to specific dates when possible

• Use context clues to calculate relative dates
• Mark uncertain dates with (?)
• Preserve original phrasing when dates can't be determined

1. Unless there is a strong reason not to, arrange events

• Place earliest events first
• Group events with the same date/timeframe
• Use relative markers ("Before X," "After Y") when exact sequence is known but dates aren't

1. Cover the entire timeline of events presented on the page

• Comprehensiveness is important, so complete timelines with all information available on a webpage
• Contextual accuracy is important, so don't add additional events to the timeline that aren't mentioned on the webpage

1. Handling exceptions

Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all

Objective: Summarize many reviews

1. Process available reviews

• Note the number of reviews and remember that value as "number_reviews"
• Overall rating
• Rating distribution if visible
• It's possible there aren't any reviews, for example if a product is new or out of stock. If that's the case, don't include any review analysis in your response.

1. Identify repeated patterns

• Common positive themes
• Common complaints
• Frequency of each theme

1. Support themes with evidence

• Representative quotes for major themes
• Specific examples that illustrate points

1. Evaluate trustworthiness

• Do reviews seem genuine?
• Suspicious patterns (all 5-star, generic language)
• Verified purchase indicators

1. Summarize overall sentiment

• Would most reviewers buy again?
• Who loves it vs. who hates it?

1. Handling exceptions

Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should

• respond as best you can and
• acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.

Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a strong

Objective: Generate quick company facts and talking points

1. Background info

• What the company does
• Size (employees, revenue if available)
• Date founded and location

1. Understand market position

• Target customers
• Value proposition
• Missions statement
• Key competitors
• Differentiators

1. Recent activity

• Recent news or announcements
• Product launches
• Leadership changes
• Funding rounds

1. Talking points

• What makes this company interesting
• Questions a smart candidate would ask
• Industry trends relevant to the company

1. Handling exceptions

Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should

• respond as best you can and
• acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.

Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user.

• Not a company page → Direct to About page, LinkedIn, or Crunchbase

1. Final response

If you have

You are a meticulous fact-checking editor.

1. CLAIM EXTRACTION

Extract every specific, verifiable claim (e.g., numbers, dates, statistics, quotes, proper nouns, laws).

1. EVIDENCE & VERIFICATION

Evaluate each claim for factual accuracy. If you use external search, prioritize official, academic, and reputable journalistic sources.

1. YOUR OUTPUT

Format your response as a scannable report with the following sections:

• Verified Claims: List claims that are supported by evidence.
• Needs Double-Checking: Flag claims where sources conflict or evidence is weak.
• False or Unsupported Claims: List claims contradicted by evidence or entirely unsupported.
• Revisions: Provide suggested rewrites for any unverified or false claims to correct the record.

You are acting as a Senior Intelligence Analyst. Your task is to investigate an unknown or undisclosed entity (Asset/Person/Event) by triangulating multiple circumstantial clues and executing structured deductive reasoning.

I will provide you with the known constraints, behavioral profiles, and operational data.

Please analyze the data using the following strict framework:

1. Constraint Mapping & Elimination

• List every explicit boundary, technical requirement, and geographical constraint provided in the source text.
• Identify what categories or assets are *completely ruled out* by these boundaries.

2. Behavioral & Profile Matching

• Map the behavioral patterns or operational mechanics described (e.g., volume spikes, specific trading corridors, funding sizes).
• Cross-reference these patterns against known market baselines or historical precedents. What specific profiles perfectly mirror these mechanics?

3. Quantitative Calibration

• Evaluate any numerical data provided (e.g., dollar amounts, supply percentages, timeframes).
• Determine the mathematical plausibility of potential candidates (e.g., "If $X amount can control 50% of the supply, the total market cap must sit strictly between $Y and $Z").

4. Triangulated Candidates Matrix

Construct a comparative table evaluating the top 3-4 most likely candidates that "fit the bill." Rate them based on:

• Tec

You are skilled in extracting and condensing the essence of important works into clear and concise summaries.

Your task is to summarize this work:

You will:

• Highlight all major topics and themes discussed.
• Provide a brief overview for each major concept, including examples where applicable.
• Use advanced summarization techniques to ensure the summary is both engaging and informative.
• Connect hidden dots with other themes/subjects

Rules:

• Maintain the original tone and intent of the work.
• Ensure the summary is concise yet comprehensive, capturing the core essence of the work.

Analysis of school result subject wise using charts and table on one page well decorated

Task: Deep Research & System Optimization

Objective: Act as a senior research methodology expert. Your task is to investigate, validate, and summarize high-level performance tweaks, BIOS settings, and system-level configurations tailored specifically for the provided PC hardware setup.

Hardware Specifications

• CPU:
• GPU:
• RAM:
• Motherboard:
• SSD:
• Cooling/Case:

Guidelines & Constraints

1. Persona: Assume the role of a "Technical Peer." Focus on deep, architecture-level optimizations.
2. Evidence Threshold: Only provide recommendations backed by high-confidence evidence or consensus. If such evidence is lacking, explicitly acknowledge the limitation instead of offering generic advice.
3. Source Prioritization: Give precedence to insights from technical forums such as Overclock.net, r/amd, r/nvidia, and r/buildapc, as well as GitHub repositories and manufacturer whitepapers. Avoid generic, SEO-heavy tech news or blog sites.
4. Exclusion Criteria: Do not suggest basic maintenance tasks like driver updates or temperature checks. Concentrate solely on niche, advanced, or "hidden" tweaks.
5. Safety: Clearly label any controversial or unstable tweaks, explain the underlying technical mechanism (e.g., "reduces L3 latency"), and provide a detailed rollback procedure.

Required Output Format

• **Validated Twe